*Dr. Rodolfo John Ortiz Teope, PhD, EdD
I still remember the moment my curiosity about Southeast Asia first took root. I was in high school at Aquinas School, San Juan City in 1986, leafing through our world history book by Gregorio Zaide, when I came across the story of Maphilindo. It was a dream of unity among Malaysia, the Philippines, and Indonesia—a vision of brothers bound by history, culture, and destiny. For a young student like me, the idea was fascinating. I imagined borders fading, leaders holding hands, and people working together to build a stronger region. It felt like a promise that Southeast Asia, if united, could rise above poverty, conflict, and foreign domination.
But as I grew quite older but I still look younger, I also came to understand why Maphilindo never thrived. National interests, political ambitions, and the ever-present shadow of corruption weakened that noble dream. Today, when I read about the protests in Jakarta, the outrage in Manila, and the skepticism in Kuala Lumpur, I cannot help but feel that the failure of Maphilindo was not just about geopolitics—it was about leadership that faltered in the face of greed.
In Indonesia, the current unrest shows just how far the bond between leaders and people has frayed. I picture the parliament building engulfed in flames, not as a random act of destruction, but as a desperate cry of citizens who can no longer endure seeing their lawmakers live in luxury while they struggle to survive. The lavish housing allowances were not just financial perks—they were insults carved into the daily lives of the poor. And when a motorcycle taxi driver was crushed to death by an armored police vehicle, it became a tragic reminder of how power, when blind and arrogant, can destroy the very people it is meant to protect. In their anger, Indonesians even stormed and looted the house of their Finance Minister, a striking act that shows how profoundly trust has been broken.
Here in the Philippines, the anger is less fiery but just as deep. Billions meant for flood-control projects have vanished into the abyss of corruption. For me, this is perhaps one of the most painful betrayals. I think of the families along riverbanks and coastal towns who live in constant fear of the next typhoon. Every peso lost is not an abstract number—it is a roof that was never repaired, a dike that was never built, a life that might be washed away in the flood.
And yet, while Indonesians rage in the streets, Filipinos are transfixed by the political theater of the Senate and the House of Representatives. We watch the grandstanding with amazement, as if performance and rhetoric could wash away the floodwaters or rebuild shattered lives. We fix our gaze on the contractors, as if they alone were the villains, while the real culprits—those who approve, who allow, who benefit—sit comfortably in every department, agency, and office of government. This is our tragedy: we marvel at the spectacle while forgetting the rot that runs through the very structure of governance.
Malaysia tells another version of the same story. A reform bill meant to fight corruption was pushed too quickly, leaving the people skeptical once again. Malaysians have long memories of the Bersih rallies, the streets filled with chants for clean governance and electoral integrity. They have tasted hope before, only to see it wither. Each time reform is rushed or mishandled, it feels like another betrayal, another mask covering the same face of power.
Looking at all three countries, I cannot help but return to that high school boy who once dreamed of Maphilindo. What hope he had in the power of unity; what faith he had that Southeast Asia could stand tall. And yet here we are—still bound not by shared progress but by shared frustration, not by a united future but by a common wound called corruption.
Corruption is not only theft—it is abandonment. It steals the trust of children who deserve schools, of parents who deserve security, of workers who deserve dignity. It takes from people the very thing they cling to in hard times: hope. That is why the cries in Jakarta, the bitter voices on Philippine social media, and the weary skepticism in Kuala Lumpur are not isolated. They are echoes of the same wound, reverberating across a region still struggling to find its way.
I write this not as an academician or a political analyst or whiner alone, but as someone who feels the same ache as the man on the motorcycle in Jakarta, the family wading through floodwaters in Bulacan, the Malaysian student growing weary of promises. I feel it because I have seen how corruption steals joy, how it reduces the dreams of nations to ashes.
Southeast Asia stands at a crossroads. We can keep drowning in this cycle of scandal and unrest, or we can choose the harder path of rebuilding trust. That choice lies in the hands of those in power—but history tells us that when leaders refuse, the people will always find their voice. And when they rise, no wall of privilege or force of repression can hold them back.
I still hold on to that boyhood vision from Zaide’s book. Perhaps Maphilindo as it was imagined is gone, but the spirit behind it—the dream of unity, dignity, and integrity—remains alive. It lives in every protester’s shout, in every family’s cry for justice, in every citizen who refuses to be silent. The question is whether our leaders will listen before the fires, the floods, and the betrayals consume not only parliaments, but the very soul of our nations.
And so, I end with this call: leaders must act now. Because
a hungry stomach knows no law. Victims of injustice will always seek revenge.
No amount of social media influence, no carefully crafted speeches, can change
the mind of angry people who are not seeking entertainment but genuine progress
and good government. If those in power do not listen, then history will
remember them not as builders of nations, but as architects of their downfall.
______________________________
