Dr. John’s Wishful is a blog where stories, struggles, and hopes for a better nation come alive. It blends personal reflections with social commentary, turning everyday experiences into insights on democracy, unity, and integrity. More than critique, it is a voice of hope—reminding readers that words can inspire change, truth can challenge power, and dreams can guide Filipinos toward a future of justice and nationhood.

Sunday, December 7, 2025

The Political Dynasty We Feed Is the Nation We Become

*Dr. Rodolfo John Ortiz Teope, PhD, EdD, DM

 


I have sat through political meetings my entire life. I’ve listened to strategists argue over precinct behavior, organizers calculate vote projections with trembling hands, and old party guards whisper reminders of battles fought long before many of us were born. But one meeting remains carved into my memory—not because of what we discussed, but because of who walked into that room, and the arrogance he carried like perfume.


The room that afternoon was filled with people who earned their place in provincial politics. Men who walked mountains at midnight to escort ballot boxes. Women who negotiated rival clans into temporary peace. Youth leaders who sacrificed their safety just to guard a precinct. These were workers of democracy—flawed, imperfect, but real. They carried stories on their shoulders that no textbook could ever teach.


Then the heir arrived.


He entered with the gait of someone raised behind high walls and guarded gates—someone who had never tasted fear, never experienced loss, never been humbled by a barangay captain who refused to be bought or by a crowd that refused to listen. His confidence was not born of competence; it was born of insulation. He looked at everyone in the room—people who had fought real battles—and treated them as if they were the inexperienced ones.


He lectured strategists who had survived political storms decades before he learned how to speak in complete sentences. He corrected party elders who once saved his father’s campaign. He scolded organizers who had built the very structures he now pretended to lead.


His arrogance was not learned.

It was inherited.

It was distilled entitlement, passed from one generation to the next.


This young man was not the disease.

He was the symptom.

The real disease was the bad dynasty that shaped him.


But in fairness to history, not all dynasties in the Philippines are malign.

Some are rare, some are quiet, but they exist—good dynasties whose public service spans generations like a torch passed, not a throne inherited.


There are families whose patriarch served in the earliest days of our Republic—where dignity was the standard and corruption a disgrace. His son rose to national prominence not through entitlement, but through years of consistent, competent, scandal-free service. And the grandson? He became a reformist mayor who digitalized governance, removed fixers, humanized public service, and reminded the country that power can be carried lightly when the heart carries the heavier load.


In Visayas, there is a family whose local leadership transformed from traditional politics into genuine reform. The father modernized hospitals and emergency response; the son returned from abroad not to flaunt credentials but to immerse himself in agriculture, learning from farmers rather than lording over them.


In Mindanao, a family who survived violence devoted their life to peace. Their name carries weight not because of fear, but because of compassion. Their children inherited this mission—not entitlement.


These are good dynasties, and when such families rise, communities rise with them.


But beside these good dynasties lie the dark dynasties—families who have mastered the art of extracting wealth from public funds and extracting loyalty from public dependence. Families whose roots wrap around entire provinces, suffocating opportunities until only their networks can breathe.


Filipinos have heard in the news about dynasties that control infrastructure projects whose concrete cracks even before elections end.

About dynasties that command private armies.

About dynasties that run agricultural smuggling rings.

About dynasties that siphon flood-control budgets through shell contractors.

About dynasties that turn relocation projects into multi-billion-peso scams.

About dynasties that dominate every bidding, every agency, every corner of their kingdom.


But perhaps nothing reveals the rot of a bad dynasty more than this painful truth:


They keep their people poor—on purpose.


Poverty is not a failure for them.

It is a strategy.


A hungry voter is obedient.

A desperate voter is cheap.

A poor barangay is a treasure chest on election day.


They ensure economic stagnation so vote-buying remains effective.

They prevent industries from thriving so people remain dependent.

They underfund education so critical thinking remains weak.

They suppress empowerment because empowered citizens dismantle dynasties.


This is why some provinces look the same today as they did 30 years ago.

This is why some municipalities remain undeveloped despite billions in internal revenue allotment.

This is why some families thrive even as their people barely survive.

 

And yet, a tragic irony follows:


People still vote for them.


A dynasty is not created by birth.

It is created by ballots.


Every vote given to a dynasty fertilizes its roots.

Every re-election tightens its chokehold.

Every distributed envelope becomes another brick in their empire.


There are always alternative candidates.

There are always independent voices.

There are always better choices.


But people often choose the dynasty anyway—

because of fear,

because of hunger,

because of habit,

because of a P500 bill wrapped in “thank you.”


Then later, they complain.

Later, they regret.

Later, they cry.

But the dynasty stands tall, because the people themselves built the tower.


And so the cycle continues.


Yet the tragedy deepens when bad dynasties mask their corruption with concrete.


There are cities that shine—clean streets, dancing fountains, bright lights, beautiful plazas, wide boulevards. Tourists take photos, social media praises the local government, and people from other towns say, “Ang ganda dito. Sana ganito rin sa amin.”


But beauty can be a smokescreen.

Progress can be cosmetic.

Infrastructure can be nothing more than corruption decorated with paint.

 

Behind many shining skylines lies a darker arithmetic:

in every bridge, a kickback;

in every road, a percentage;

in every building, an inflated cost;

in every plaza, a hidden deal.


Not all infrastructure is corruption—but in the hands of a bad dynasty, it often is.


True development is not measured by cement.

It is measured by how many families rise because of it.


I once walked through a city ruled by the same dynasty for over three decades.

The streets were immaculate, the parks Instagrammable, the city hall grand enough to rival a national museum. It looked like a model city.


But behind the painted walls, the lives of the people remained untouched.


A tricycle driver told me, “Sir, gumanda lang yung paligid. Pero buhay namin, hindi.”

A vendor whispered, “Yung ginhawa, pang-picture lang. Hindi pang-katawan.”

A public school teacher confessed, “Maganda ang city hall, pero yung estudyante ko gutom.”


A city can be beautiful, yet its people remain broken.

A city can look rich, yet its families remain poor.

 

A bad dynasty builds for visibility.

A good dynasty builds for human dignity.


This brings us to the most painful truth of all:


The political dynasty we feed is the nation we become.


If we feed dynasties that keep us poor,

we become a country drowning in poverty.


If we feed dynasties that mask corruption with concrete,

we become a country blinded by illusions.


If we feed dynasties that silence our voices,

we become a country without a voice.


If we feed dynasties that build monuments instead of futures,

we become a museum of wasted potential.

 

But if we feed dynasties—or leaders—who honor service, truth, and integrity,

we become a nation capable of hope.


Because in the end, democracy is brutally simple:

 

We elect the leaders we deserve,

and we live in the country their leadership creates.

 

If we continue to vote out of fear, hunger, or habit,

then we will continue to suffer under the families who cultivate that fear, that hunger, that habit.

 

But if one day—just one election day—we choose differently,

if we dare to vote for competence, humility, and integrity,

then perhaps the cycle will finally break.

 

And when that day comes,

when a voter stands in front of a ballot and chooses not the dynasty they fear or the dynasty that pays,

but the leader who inspires—

that is the day the Philippines will begin its long-overdue revolution.

 

A revolution not of guns,

not of rallies,

not of blood—

but of ballots.

 

Because the fate of this nation has always been in the hands of the people.

The tragedy is that we have forgotten our own power.

The miracle will begin the moment we remember.

 _____

 *About the author:

Dr. Rodolfo “John” Ortiz Teope is a distinguished Filipino academicpublic intellectual, and advocate for civic education and public safety, whose work spans local academies and international security circles. With a career rooted in teaching, research, policy, and public engagement, he bridges theory and practice by making meaningful contributions to academic discourse, civic education, and public policy. Dr. Teope is widely respected for his critical scholarship in education, managementeconomicsdoctrine development, and public safety; his grassroots involvement in government and non-government organizations; his influential media presence promoting democratic values and civic consciousness; and his ethical leadership grounded in Filipino nationalism and public service. As a true public intellectual, he exemplifies how research, advocacy, governance, and education can work together in pursuit of the nation’s moral and civic mission.


 

Dr. Rodolfo John Ortiz Teope

Dr. Rodolfo John Ortiz Teope

Search This Blog