*Dr. Rodolfo John Ortiz Teope, PhD, EdD, DM
The last time I visited Teresa, Rizal was in the late 2009 and early 2010, during the intensity of a national and local election campaign. I remember a modest town—quiet, familiar, unassuming. It did not have much, but it did not feel deprived. People lived simply, and life moved with a certain balance.
Years later, I returned—not for politics, not for speeches—but to visit a friend. I was honestly amazed. Teresa had changed. Roads were better. Houses looked sturdier. Small businesses had grown. On the surface, it looked like progress had finally arrived. The town felt more alive, more confident, more connected to the present.
And then my friend said something that unraveled everything.
She told me that taking a bath had become rare.
Not occasional. Not seasonal. Rare. Something you wait for. Something you plan around. Something you miss. She spoke calmly, almost casually, as if this were now normal. Laundry was postponed for days because water might come late at night—or not at all. Dishes stayed longer in the sink, grease hardening, not because of neglect but because water simply was not there. “You plan your life around water,” she said, quietly.
That was the moment progress began to feel hollow.
This is how governance failure enters a home—not with sirens or headlines, but with small humiliations repeated daily. In Teresa today, dignity is rationed. Cleanliness depends not on discipline, but on pressure, timing, and luck. Life is measured in buckets.
As of late 2025 and into early 2026, this has become the daily reality across barangays like San Gabriel, Calumpang, May-Iba, Poblacion, Dulumbayan, and even along Roman Roxas Road. Residents endure unpredictable daily interruptions, low pressure, and in some cases outages lasting up to four days. Four days of deciding whether water is for bathing, cooking, or washing clothes. Four days of quietly lowering one’s standards of dignity just to get through.
Water trucks now arrive where pipes have failed, turning what should be a basic service into a temporary mercy. Emergency repairs are announced again and again. Pipes break. Pumps fail. Pressure disappears. Explanations change, but the outcome remains the same—the water does not come. And hanging over all of this is a deeper fear, rarely spoken aloud: studies have long warned that the Morong–Teresa sub-watershed faces serious sustainability risks, even the possibility of drying up. Which means this suffering is not only present—it may be permanent if nothing changes.
It is here that the cruelty of national priorities becomes unbearable.
While families in Teresa store water like treasure, the nation talks in billions. Billions of pesos allocated to flood-control projects. Billions justified in the name of safety and protection. Billions that, again and again, become entangled in allegations of corruption, overpricing, and ghost projects. Hearings are called. Promises are made. Outrage cycles through the news. Money flows swiftly through contracts and committees.
But water does not flow through pipes.
Flood control is supposed to protect life. Yet corruption within it creates another kind of disaster—one that does not come with storms, but with silence. A slow disaster that settles into homes and bodies. While rivers are “managed” on paper, a town like Teresa cannot meet the most basic human need. While spreadsheets look impressive, kitchens stay dirty and bathrooms remain unused.
This is where the crisis becomes deeply moral.
I find myself thinking of the small, unseen casualties—those no budget hearing ever mentions. The young girls with beautiful curly hair who can no longer rinse properly, whose hair once flowed freely but now must be tied up and endured because water is too precious to spend on comfort or care. This is not vanity; it is dignity, identity, womanhood quietly constrained by scarcity. I think of senior citizens who were taught that cleanliness is part of survival, especially when age brings illness—those who need regular bathing to prevent infections, skin breakdown, and complications, yet now must choose between medical cleanliness and endurance. I think of clothes that sit unwashed for too long, absorbing sweat and dust, carrying the weight of days because water did not come. I think of mothers rationing water between cooking and cleaning, of children going to school feeling unclean, of workers starting their day already exhausted—not from labor, but from deprivation.
These are not dramatic tragedies. They are quiet violations of public health and human dignity. And they are the direct, human consequence of corruption.
What makes this unbearable is knowing how preventable it all is. Water security does not require monuments or megaprojects. It requires care—additional wells, storage tanks, repaired pipelines, reliable power for pumps, honest planning, transparent spending. Compared to the billions lost to graft, these are small, almost humble needs. But humble needs do not enrich anyone. And so they wait.
Teresa has representation in Congress. It is not a remote town. It is not invisible. And yet, at the national level, almost no one knows—perhaps no one has bothered to say—how severe this crisis is. While the country is consumed by the flood-control scandal and while lawmakers debate and celebrate the passage of the 2026 national budget, Teresa remains waterless. The budget speaks loudly about infrastructure and resilience, yet it says nothing with urgency about water security for towns like this. No lifeline. No recognition that without water, every promise of development collapses.
Representation should mean making the invisible visible. It should mean standing in plenary halls and saying: while we argue over billions, my constituents cannot even bathe. When that does not happen, silence becomes a decision.
When I left my friend that day, what stayed with me was not anger, but her exhaustion. When people grow tired of expecting the basics, something is deeply broken.
Flood-control scams will pass through the news cycle. Budgets will be replaced by new ones. But the absence of water in Teresa continues—quietly, relentlessly—inside homes, inside bodies, inside daily routines. And history will not be kind to a system that allowed billions to move freely while a town stayed dry.
Progress that cannot deliver water is not progress at all. Until those in power decide that water must flow before wealth does, Teresa, Rizal will remain a painful reminder that a nation can spend billions—and still fail its people in the most basic, most human way.
____
