Loyalty to Leaders Should Never Cost Us Our Conscience
Someone once asked me: “Doc, hindi ba dati kang miyembro, tagapagsalita, at Deputy Secretary General ng Partido Federal ng Pilipinas? Bakit hindi ka nakikipagbardagulan para sa Pangulo? Bakit objective pa rin ang mga sinusulat mo?”
The expectation was clear: because I had belonged to the party, I should defend its leaders against criticism.
I explained that I joined because I believed in federalism and what it could contribute to our country. My commitment was to an idea of governance and the reforms it promised.
My party membership never meant surrendering my judgment.
Hindi ko kailangang makipag-away upang patunayang naging tapat ako sa isang adhikain. Ang paniniwala sa federalismo ay hindi obligasyong sang-ayunan ang bawat kilos ng mga taong nagsusulong nito.
Then came another question: “Pero kapag kawani sila ng pamahalaan, hindi ba dapat ipinagtatanggol nila ang Pangulo at ang administrasyon?”
Government employees should fulfill their duties faithfully. Political party members should advance their organization’s principles. Both responsibilities require enough honesty to recognize when something has gone wrong.
It is called civil service, not idolatry service.
May tungkuling dapat gampanan ang kawani ng pamahalaan. May adhikaing dapat isulong ang miyembro ng partido. Hindi dapat kailangang ipikit ang mga mata upang manatiling kabilang.
There is something heartbreaking about seeing the desire to serve disappear beneath the pressure to please.
Someone may enter government remembering a mother who once waited helplessly outside an office. Another may join a party hoping to give neglected communities a stronger voice. Those beginnings matter. They deserve to be remembered when questions become uncomfortable.
Sayang kung ang hangaring tumulong ay mauuwi lamang sa obligasyong pumalakpak. Sayang kung ang dating nakauunawa sa hirap ng mamamayan ay matututong mainis sa kanilang mga hinaing.
Employees assigned to explain government policies should do so accurately. False allegations deserve factual answers. Successful programs deserve recognition. Failures require explanation and correction.
Ang pagiging objective ay hindi nangangahulugang pantay ang tama at mali. Ibig sabihin nito, iisa ang pamantayan kahit magkaiba ang kampo.
Imagine a hypothetical situation: two towns have flood-control projects declared complete. Heavy rain arrives, and homes in both towns are flooded. One project was implemented under an administration a person supports; the other under an administration that person opposes.
Would that person ask the same questions about both? Would comparable evidence receive equal scrutiny?
Before answering, imagine standing inside either flooded home.
Pareho ang basang kutson. Pareho ang batang nanginginig habang inililikas. Pareho ang magulang na nagbibilang ng natitirang pera, iniisip kung pagkain o gamit sa paaralan ang unang papalitan.
Walang kulay ng partido ang tubig na pumasok sa kanilang tahanan.
Those families need answers and assistance. If an investigation establishes wrongdoing, they deserve accountability as well. Their suffering should never be dismissed simply because acknowledging it might embarrass an ally.
Government employees and party members can defend an official against unsupported accusations while supporting a fair examination of the facts.
Hindi kailangang mamili sa pagitan ng makatarungang pagtrato sa opisyal at malasakit sa mamamayan. Parehong kailangang pangalagaan.
Political attachment can be deeply personal. A family may remember emergency assistance. A community may remember an official who listened after years of neglect. Such gratitude deserves respect, together with the freedom to question a later decision.
Ang tulong na dumating noong walang ibang malapitan ay hindi basta nalilimutan. Ngunit hindi dapat maging kapalit nito ang pananahimik sa susunod na pagkakamali.
Fear also makes honesty difficult. Government employees may worry about their livelihood. Party members may dread losing friendships built over years of shared work.
Mahirap iyon, lalo na kung may pamilyang umaasa. Masakit maramdamang lumalamig ang dating mainit na samahan dahil lamang hindi sila sumabay sa palakpakan.
That fear deserves compassion. Leaders also have a responsibility to make room for unwelcome facts. Problems become harder to solve when everyone learns to report only what the person in charge wants to hear.
Survival should still have principles.
Earning a living should not require spreading falsehoods, humiliating critics, or stepping on others to gain approval. Government employees and party members can express support through useful work: explaining a policy, correcting an error, following up a complaint, or ensuring that someone waiting for assistance is heard.
Hindi sukatan ng paglilingkod ang dami ng nakaaway nila. Mas mahalaga kung may problemang naayos at may taong umuwing mas magaan ang dinadala.
Terms will end. Leadership will change. The applause will fade.
But a parent may remember who helped when a child needed medicine. A worker may remember who patiently explained a requirement. A family may remember who listened when turning away would have been easier.
Iyon ang paglilingkod at MALASAKIT na nananatili kahit napalitan na ang pangalan sa pintuan ng opisina.
May lider ang kanilang partido. May Pangulo ang kanilang pamahalaan. Ngunit ang kanilang konsensiya ay hindi dapat may amo.
_________________________________________________________
Dear Reader,
I invite you to explore my complete collection of published books now available on Amazon. Whether you are seeking in-depth analysis, strategic insights, or engaging narratives, my catalog covers a range of essential topics designed to inform, inspire, and provoke thoughtful discussion.
You can browse all my current titles, read excerpts, and order your copies directly through my official Amazon Author Page:
Click this Image to View:
 |
| BEST SELLER |
.jpg)
Warm regards,
*About the author:
